|
|
Fingerprint Vertification Competition (FVC)
|
|
|
FVC2006 (Medal table of Open Category)
|
|
|
Suprema |
|
|
|
P009 |
|
|
|
P088 |
|
|
|
P058 |
|
|
|
P065 |
|
|
|
|
|
* Additional information on FVC2006 is available on the Web at http://bias.csr.unibo.it/fvc2006/
|
|
|
FVC2004 (Average results of Light Category)
|
|
|
1 |
Suprema |
3.51% |
2 |
P107 |
3.69% |
3 |
P108 |
3.96% |
4 |
P101 |
4.29% |
5 |
P103 |
4.33% |
|
|
Avg EER = Average Equal Error Rate(when FMR is equal to FNMR) |
|
* Additional information on FVC2004 is available on the Web at http://bias.csr.unibo.it/fvc2004/
|
|
|
Aim
|
|
The aim of the FVC is to track recent advances in fingerprint verification and to benchmark the state-of-the-art in fingerprint technology.
|
|
|
Categories
|
|
The Open category has no limits on memory requirements and template size.
The Light category limits on verification time, memory usage and template size. |
|
|
Databases
|
|
For fair comparison, database were collected by using the following sensors/technologies :
|
|
|
FVC2004 |
CrossMatch (Optical sensor) |
Digital Persona (Optical sensor) |
Atmel (Thermal-sweeping sensor) |
Synthesized image |
|
|
|
FVC2006 |
AuthenTec (Electric field sensor) |
Biometrika (Optical sensor) |
Atmel (Thermal sweeping sensor) |
Synthesized image |
|
|
|
Participants
|
|
For fair comparison, database were collected by using the following sensors/technologies :
|
|
|
FVC2004 |
43 participants (29 industrial, 6 academic, and 8 independent developers) |
67 algorithms submitted (41 in the Open Category and 26 in the Light Category) |
|
|
|
FVC2006 |
53 participants (27 industrial, 13 academic, and 13 independent developers) |
70 algorithms submitted (44 in the Open Category and 26 in the Light Category) |
|
|
|
(source) |